主站首页|本所概况|新闻动态|本所学人|学术前沿|本所成果|人才培养|学术刊物|基地管理|清史纂修|清史文献馆|清风学社
  
专业概况 交流动态 新书评介 学术研究 师资队伍
站内搜索: 请输入文章标题或文章内容所具有的关键字 整站文章 中国历史文献学研究
 您现在的位置:首页 >> 中国历史文献学研究 >> 专业概况 >> 学位论文 >> 详细内容
2006年历史文献学专业硕士论文摘要
来源:清史所 作者:清史所 点击数:2324 更新时间:2015-5-5
2006年历史文献学专业硕士论文摘要
1、卢文弨程朱理学思想研究
论文作者:张波
导师姓名:李景屏
培养单位:历史学院清史所
论文名称:卢文弨程朱理学思想研究
中文摘要
    应该说卢文弨是一个汉学家,如果我们非要依照传统的观念来划分的话,而且,是乾嘉汉学中当之无愧的代表性人物之一。但是,我们不能忘记他的出身与早期所受的教育问题,因为这些方面对于其以后的治学活动以及其学术思想都产生了不可忽视的影响。卢文弨出身于理学世家,其祖父卢之翰与外祖父冯景都是对于程朱理学具有很深信仰的文人,其父亲卢存心与岳父桑调元更是清初著名理学家老师的得意弟子。其中,作为卢文弨岳父与老师的桑调元对于卢文弨更是影响匪浅。可以说,正是通过其桑调元的直接教授,卢文弨对于劳史一系所尊奉的清初程朱理学进行了最初的系统学习,并且从此建立了一种深深的尊奉态度。其后,虽然卢文弨吸收了乾嘉汉学的治学方法,并且被后世划分为乾嘉汉学阵营中的代表之一,但是,卢文弨的治学依旧是以其早期所接受的程朱理学思想体系为基本指导的。这一点也就奠定了其对于禅佛陆王等所谓异端之学的理性批判的思想基调。但是,明末清初以来的程朱理学毕竟已经具有了比之前代更为理性经世的精神,而且,乾嘉汉学实事求是的精神与之相互融合,使得卢文弨对于禅佛陆王等所谓异端之学的批判又建立在了一种极为理性的基础之上。
英文摘要
    It should be admitted that Lu Wen Chao is a sinologist, if we non- must defer to traditional the idea divides, moreover, is one of representative characters which in the QianJia sinology deserves. But, we cannot forget his family background and the education he received when he was young. Because these aspects were going to have all had the noticeable influence. On his scholarly research the activity as well as his academic thought.Lu Wen Chao was born in Neo-Confucianism aristocratic family, both his maternal grandfather Feng Jing and his grandfather Lu were writers who had the very deep belief regarding Cheng the Zhu thought. His father Lu with wife's father Sang Diao Yuan is the clear at the beginning of renowned lixuejia teacher's self-satisfied disciple intentionally. Among them, took Lu Wen Chao the wife's father and Mr.'s/Mrs.'s Sang Diao Yuan is the influence is vulgar regarding Lu Wen?. It can be said that, was precisely through its Professor Sang Diaoyuan direct, Lu Wen Chao clear at the beginning of Cheng which one was respects regarding the fatigue history the Zhu Neo-Confucianism has carried on the initial system study, and henceforth established one kind of depth to respect the manner. After that, although Lu Wen Chao absorbed the dry fine sinology to do scholarly research the method, and is divided by the later generation into in dry fine sinology camp representative one, but, Lu Wen Chao did scholarly research is as before Cheng which accepted by its early time the Zhu Neo-Confucianism ideology for the basic instruction. This point has also established it the rational critique thought main key which and so on the so-called heresy studies regarding imperial sacrifices Buddha Lu Wang. But since, end of the Ming dynasty clear at the beginning of Cheng the Zhu Neo-Confucianism already had the spirit after all which governs compared to a before generation of more rationality, moreover, the dry fine sinology realistic spirit fused mutually with it, causes Lu Wen Chao the critique which and so on the so-called heresy studied regarding imperial sacrifices Buddha Lu Wang to establish above one kind of extremely rational foundation.

2、毕沅学术研究
论文作者:夏永丽
导师姓名:李景屏
培养单位:历史学院清史所
论文名称:毕沅学术研究
中文摘要
    清乾嘉学术是文化发展的高峰之一,而乾嘉学术的发达,不单单是因为学者自身将其毕生精力放置于学术研究和学术著述活动中,还由于这一时期官府和官宦大臣对学术的重视、组织和资助。正是基于此种原因,研究被梁启超称为“乾嘉护法”之一的毕沅就显得较为重要。毕沅,乾嘉时期重要的封疆大吏之一,同时亦是乾嘉时期重要的学术组织者和这一时期最慷慨的学术赞助人。他曾先后担任过陕西巡抚、河南巡抚、湖广总督等职,在任职之地开设幕府,招揽当时著名的学者严长明、邵晋涵、章学诚、孙星衍、钱大昕等入幕,共同探讨学术,编修史书,校勘典籍。对待传统文化,毕沅认为经义当宗汉儒,而著《传经表》;文字当宗许氏,而著《经典文字书》和《音同义异辩》;史学必通地理,而校《山海经》,补正《晋书地理志》,辑《晋太康三年地记》和《王隐晋书地道记》;金石可证经史,而作《关中金石记》、《中州金石记》、《山左金石记》;史学当重著轻考据,而著《续资治通鉴》、《史籍考》、《西安府志》、《湖北通志》、《长安志》、《礼泉县志》、《长武县志》、《直隶邠州志》、《淳化县志》、《三水县志》、《澄城县志》等。毕沅及其幕宾著述颇多,但本论文主要探讨的是毕沅及幕宾为乾嘉学术做出的巨大贡献和毕沅的“金石可证经史”思想和“史学当重著轻考据”思想。毕沅及其幕宾校勘古代典籍,编修史书,为乾嘉学术发展和中国传统文化的发展做出的贡献主要体现在四个方面:即校刊古代典籍的学术成就、编纂金石学的学术成就、辑佚史地著作的学术成就和史著编撰的学术成就。经毕沅及其幕宾校勘的古代典籍共有二十种之多,涉及经、史、子、集诸方面,且因其校勘时注意对版本的选择和相异之处的保存,为世人保留了珍贵的学术资料。对金石学的贡献,突出表现在其用金石之学证经史方面,为后来王国维提出“二重证据法”奠定基础。辑佚史地著作则进一步完善了清代的学术发展,而史著的编纂则突出了毕沅“史学当重著轻考据”的学术思想,更对当时学术界出现的考据之风是一种更正,提醒学术界当重视著述。毕沅及其幕宾在“金石可证经史”思想的指导下,先后编修《关中金石记》、《中州金石记》和《山左金石记》,成为有清一代著名的金石学家。在“史学当重著轻考据”的学术思想指导下,又先后完成两部历史学巨著——《续资治通鉴》和《史籍考》,同时,他还延请幕宾修纂了《西安府志》、《湖北通志》等诸多方志史,使学人得以更好的了解地方历史风俗。毕沅及幕府因先后活动于陕西、河南、湖北等地,其幕宾亦因幕府的变动而有所变化。先后在其幕的有当时著名的学者严长明、邵晋涵、孙星衍、章学诚、武亿等,而受其邀共同参校其著述的还有著名史学家钱大昕、卢文弨等人。正是由于这种地域及人员的变化,促进了学术的交流和发展;亦是由于这种变化,使毕沅能将不同的学人集中于自己的幕府,使他们在其幕各擅其长,各尽所能,在学术领域创造出了巨大的学术成就。这些学术成就,填补了诸多学术领域的不足,为清代学术的发展和乾嘉学术的辉煌作出了巨大的贡献。
英文摘要
    Qing QianJia academic cultural development is one of the peak, and QianJia academic advancement, not only because of its own scholars lifelong energy available academic research and academic writing activities, but also because this period of government and academic officials of the attention, organization and funding. It is based on such factors, the study was Liang Qichao called " QianJia protect" one of the Biyuan becomes more important. Biyuan, an important Fengjiangdaili(Governor) during QianJia period, but also is an important academic organizers and the most generous academic sponsors of this period. He has served successively Shanxi XunFu, Henan XunFu, the Governor of the area covering parts of Huangnan, Hubei, Guangdong and Guangxi in the office to create general's office, then recruit renowned scholars Yan Channg Ming, Shao Jin Han, Zhang Xue Cheng, Sun Xing Yan, and Qian Da Xin into the screen in order to explore the academic, says history books, collecting classics. Treatment of traditional culture, Biyuan that when cases of the sages, and write the Jing Zhuan Biao; When cases of female characters, and write the Jing Dian Wen Zi Shu and the Yin Tong Yi Yi Bian; History is the geographical boundary, and proofread the Shan Hai Jing also check and fill up series Jin Shu Di Li Zhi and compile the Jin Tai Kang San Nian Di Ji and Wang Yin Jin Shu Di Dao Ji ;inscriptions may permit the history, and for the Guan Zhong Jin Shi Ji, Zhong Zhou Jin Shi Ji, Shan Zuo Jin Shi Ji; When the history of the light test, and the Xu Zi Zhi Tong Jian, Shi Ji Kao, Xi An Fu Zhi, Hu Bei Tong Zhi, Chang An Zhi, Li Quan Xian Zhi, Chang Wu Xian Zhi, Zhi Li Bin Xian Zhi, Chun Hua Xian Zhi, San Shui Xian Zhi, Cheng Cheng Xian Zhi. Biyuan and his aides writing a lot, but the main thesis is to explore Biyuan and his aides for QianJia academic and Biyuan make great contributions "may permit the history of bronze and stone inscriptions," and "When the history of the test light" thinking. Biyuan and his aides addition ancient classics, compiled history books for QianJia academic development and the development of Chinese traditional culture contribution primarily in four areas : the academic journal ancient classics, the academic study compiled bronze and stone inscriptions, Jiyi history books in the history of academic preparation and academic achievements. After Biyuan and his aides addition there are 20 varieties of the ancient classics, covering Jing, Shi, Zi, Ji, and their relevance to the attention of the options and differences versions of the depositary for the world to retain the precious academic information. Of bronze and stone inscriptions of the contribution of its outstanding performance in the school certificate in the history of bronze and stone inscriptions, as subsequently Wang Guo Wei "two - Evidence Act," laying the foundation. JiYi history books is a method of further improving the academic development, and a history of the codification of the highlights Biyuan "When the history of light test but focus compile" academic thinking more of a test according to the academic community wind is a correction to remind academia when writing. Biyuan and his aides in the "history of the bronze and stone inscriptions may permit" ideological leadership, has compiled the Guan Zhong Jin Shi Ji, Zhong Zhou Jin Shi Ji and Shan Zuo Jin Shi Ji, then become a famous bronze and stone inscriptions-generation scientists. Follow the " When the history of light test but focus compile " academic thought, and completed two historical school texts ,Xu Zi Zhi Tong Jian and Shi Ji Kao. At the same time, he also invited his aides compile Xi An Fu Zhi , Hu Bei Tong Zhi, and many other local history books so that people can learn better understanding of local customs history. Biyuan and his aides have activities in the general's office for ShanXi, HeNan, HuBei, and other places, the general's office changes its aides also change. In its screen has a famous scholar Yan Chang Ming, Shao Jin Han, and Sun Xing Yan, Zhang Xue Cheng, Wu Yi, while those invited were writing their joint Senate-renowned historians Qian Da Xin, Lu Wen Chao and others. It is because of this geographical and personnel changes, the promotion of academic exchange and development; It is due to this change that  Biyuan can concentrate different scholars in his office so that they can do what they are good at and do everything. they create great academic achievements in the realm of academic. These achievements, filled many areas of inadequate academic development and made tremendous contributions for the academic brilliance of Qing Dynasty and QianJia.

3、晚清古文《尚书》辨真研究——以洪良品为中心
论文作者:马延炜
导师姓名:黄爱平
培养单位:历史学院清史所
论文名称:晚清古文《尚书》辨真研究——以洪良品为中心
中文摘要
    对古文《尚书》的考辨,自宋明以来,一直聚讼不绝,产生了一大批学者和著作。但是,以往学界在集中研究辨伪诸说及其代表人物与著作之外,虽然也注意到同时存在的辨真学者与著作,但却由于对于辨真文献所作出的“古文《尚书》非伪”这一结论的不屑与存而不论,这些已有的研究成果虽然注意到了这样一种学术现象,却也由此对这样一种学术现象的形成原因与特质亦少有研究。与这种流行观点相反,本文指出,在轰轰烈烈的辨伪活动之外,有一股虽然微弱,但一直不绝如缕的辨真努力,并以晚清为一个特定的高峰,产生了一批辨真学者和著作。通过对其中一个典型人物——洪良品及其作品为中心的分析,本文认为,这些为以往学界所存而不论的《尚书》辨真著作,在一方面发现了以往辨伪学者考辨过程中的一些漏洞,因此,在对古文《尚书》的考辨研究中,自有其不可忽略的学术价值;另一方面,这些虽然为当今学者所忽略,却的确存在于清代,并以晚清为特有高峰的辨真学者及其著作之所以产生,实际上,和晚清中国社会的危机、如何解决这种危机,以及学者们对古文在维持世道人心方面的作用等方面有着极其密切的因果联系,因此,这些辨真著作,在思想史方面,同样也具有非常重要的价值。本文的主体部分分为三个部分。第一章是对洪良品基本情况的研究。由于目前学术界对这个人物的研究几乎是一片空白的情况,而要了解他的古文《尚书》辨真之学,又不能不对其人本身的情况作出梳理。所以,本文第一章名为《洪良品概况》,通过对现有资料的考订,勾勒出一个其人生平、著述的大体面貌(更详细的情况参见附录),并对其《尚书》辨真著作在学术上的价值。在具体分析中,本文从古文《尚书》的篇数和文体两个问题入手,分别列举了以阎若璩为代表辨伪派和以洪良品为代表的辨真派在这两个问题上的观点,指出洪良品等晚清辨真学者的考论,虽不足以彻底推翻自宋明以来,直到清初学者所作出的古文为伪的结论,却也在相当程度上指出了这些学者考辨过程中的漏洞,有助于我们今天更好地开展对古文《尚书》的研究。第三章着重研究晚清时代,在“晚出古文为伪”这一看法已然为大多数学者所遵奉的情况下,还有以洪良品为代表的学者之所以不遗余力地为其辨真的原因,也即写作这些在学理上并不完全成立的著作的非学术性动机,以及这些文本背后所展现的思想世界。总体而言,本文认为,以往学界多从研究古文《尚书》本身的真伪问题出发,并由于认同古文为伪的观点,自然将视阈集中在辨伪学者及其著作上。就文献本身的研究而言,这样一种学术倾向虽然是可以理解的,但并不是完全恰当的。因为历史文献学所研究的文献的历史,绝不应当仅仅是一部文献求真的历史,还应当是各种文献在流传过程中此消彼长、此亡彼存的历史,更应当包括这种种现象背后的原因。推而广之,文献学研究的成果,不仅仅应当成为一部对文献求真过程所进行追述后的“学术史”,更应当成为包含这种学术史在内的能够反映时代思想风貌的“社会史”。因此,通过这些研究,本文认为,我们今天古文《尚书》学的研究,一方面必须对这部经典的真伪问题有所认定,另一方面,也必须从历史本身出发来考察这种考辨的过程。重新审视这些辨真著作,一方面有助于我们今天更好的开展对《尚书》的研究;另一方面,也有助于我们认识更接近于历史真实的《尚书》学史。
英文摘要
    The study of the factuality of the old text Document (guwen shangshu ),from the Song Dynasty to Ming Dynasty, has argued back and forth. Three were many discussions and many different opinions in many scholars’ works. The previous academic circles, besides the study of those attackers’ works and opinions, however, has absent from the study of the cause and characteristic of those defencers and their works, although the previous academic circles had realized the real existence of this academic phenomenon. That’s all because they regard the defencers’ opinion—“the old text Document is real” as not worthy of serious consideration. On contrary to this prevalent viewpoint, this thesis’s author points out that , besides those attackers and their works, there was a faint but not extinct tendency of defence, which came to specific peak in the Late-Qing Dynasty. There were a lot of defencers and defences in this era. Through the analysis of a typical example: Hong Liangpin and his works of this period. The thesis’s author believes that these defence works for the old text Document, which were excluded from consideration by the modern scholars, had figured out some weak points in the attackers’ argument. So the defence works have the unignorable academic value in the study of the old text Document. On the other hand, these defence works, although were ignored by the modern scholars, were really existed in the Qing Dynasty and came to the specific peak in the Late-Qing Dynasty. The reason behind these defence works also had the significance cause and effect relationship with the social-crisis, how to deal with this crisis and defencers’ view about the unreplaced value for the society in the old text Document. So, there defence works has the very important ideological value. The main body of this thesis can be divided to three parts. Chapter 1 is the study of Hong Liangpin’s basic case. If we want to comprehend Hong’s defence of the old document, we must first sort out his basic circumstances. Unfortunately, the present study of Hong Liangpin is almost a gap. As a matter of fact, this chapter is name A survey of Hong Liangpin. Through the examine and correct to the present material, draw the outline of Hong’s life and writing.(more details, see the appendix)and make general study of his defence works. Chapter 2 focus on the study of academic value of defence works in the Late-Qing Dynasty, which is represented by Hong. In this specific analysis, the thesis starts with the two questions: table of contents and literary form, and list the attacks’ opinion which is represented by Yan Ruoqu and the defencers’ opinions which is represented by Hong Liangpin separately. The author of this thesis points out that, although the defencers can’t reverse the conclusion of attackers completely, they did point out some weak points of the attackers’ argument in a part. Therefore, we will benefit from their result in the study of the old text Document. Chapter 3 focus on the reason why there were so many defencers defence the old text Document spare on effort when most of the scholars have already agreed with the conclusion of the attackers’ in the Late-Qing Dynasty , the ideological word beyond the works as well.  In conclusion, the thesis’s author believe that the previous academic circles has started out with the factuality of the old text Document, and because of the acquaintance with the idea of the old text Document is unreal, the previous scholars has narrowed the visual field to the attackers and their works. It is can be comprehended on the study of the historical document itself, but not complete. Because the aim of the study of historical document shouldn’t be just the history of seek truth document, it should be a history of the growth and decline of every kinds of documents when they spread as well, furthermore, this kind of study also should conclude the cause of these phenomenon. As a matter of fact, the result of study of the historical document shouldn’t be just a academic history of recount for the process of the pursuit of truth, It also should be a social history which conclude this kind of academic history , and can reflect the real and complete social circumstances. Therefore, through the study of the defencers and their works, the author of the thesis believes that the modern scholars , when they study the old text Document , on the one hand , should has the idea of the factuality of his document. On the other hand, they also study the real history of study of the old text Document. It is necessary to resurvey these defencers , and the resurvey will make our study of the old text Document better and help us near the real history about the study of the old text Document.

4、北宋王珪及其《华阳集》研究
论文作者:李皛
导师姓名:李晓菊
培养单位:历史学院历史系
论文名称:北宋王珪及其《华阳集》研究
中文摘要
    《华阳集》是北宋王珪的别集。王珪历仕仁、英、神、哲四朝,典内外制十八年,为相十六年,在宋仁宗至宋神宗这一段特殊的历史时期占有特殊的历史地位,然而长期以来得不到学者应有的重视和客观的评价。据现存史料记载及《华阳集》所收文献,王珪实为北宋重要的文学家和政治家,并对当时社会产生了很大影响,是古文运动、濮议之争、熙丰变法、熙河开边、元丰改制等重大历史事件中不容忽视的人物。《华阳集》本身在版本流传上独具特色,在内容上尤以收录制词丰富而见长,但同时也具有四库馆臣辑录的“大典本”别集的一些带共同性的问题。《华阳集》所载文献,在北宋的内政、外交、宗教、礼乐制度等方面具有重要的史料研究价值,并且具有重要的文学史史料价值,特别是在骈体公文方面,能够对今人对北宋文学史的研究作以补充。《华阳集》还具有重要的文献校勘价值,可以与其他传世文献对勘,补正《宋会要辑稿》、《续资治通鉴长编》等所记载内容之阙误,并有助于恢复《华阳集》与《宋大诏令集》等所载相同篇目之原貌。总而言之,对王珪及其《华阳集》的研究在今天具有重要意义
英文摘要
    HuaYang Ji is WangGui’s literary anthology. WangGui had served for four emperors in the North Song Dynasty, these emperors were Ren Zong,Ying Zong,Shen Zong and ZheZong. WangGui had been in charge of drafting state announcement for 18 years, and held the post of prime minister for 16 years. The appraisal of WangGui is extremely unfair in a long time. According to historical data and HuaYang Ji, WangGui is an outstanding statesman and writer; he had the huge influence to North Song Dynasty. In some significant events, for instance the Movement of Ancient Chinese Prose, the Argument of Ceremony, the Xi Feng Reform, the Xi He Expansion and the Yuan Feng Reform, WangGui is a strong character. The evolution of edition is characteristic about HuaYang Ji. The characteristic of HuaYang Ji is containing the massive state announcement. HuaYang Ji had some common problem of DaDianBen literary anthology. The content of HuaYang Ji with great historical value in very many aspects of North Song Dynasty, for instance Internal affairs, Diplomacy, Religion and Ceremony. In addition, HuaYang Ji with great literature value too, specially in the domain of   Parallel Prose, it can be carry on the supplement to the present research. HuaYang Ji with great value about textual criticism, to compares with other literature. Correct the mistakes of Xu Zizhi Tongjian ChangBian   and Song HuiYao JiGao. Restores the original condition of the identical article in HuaYang Ji and Song DaZhaoLing Ji. In brief, a research on the WangGui and his HuaYang Ji with the vital significance in today.

5、南宋楼钥学术研究
论文作者:鲁颖
导师姓名:李晓菊
培养单位:历史学院历史系
论文名称:南宋楼钥学术研究
中文摘要
    浙东学术虽是区域性学术,但在中国学术史上却占有重要地位,相关研究也成果显著。以往对于浙东学术的研究,主要偏重于个别学派或代表人物,因此许多不入学派之门的学者往往受到忽视。本文所要论述的楼钥就是其中的典型代表,他的学术成就较少引起人们的关注。楼钥出生于浙东四明地区,生活的年代正值南宋孝、光朝文化繁盛时期,从小就受到家学的良好熏陶,经科举入仕,以词臣的身份立于朝廷,挺然为一代名臣,其官品人品多被人所称赞。留下一部重要的文集《攻媿集》,其中保存了大量的研究资料。本文以《攻媿集》为基础,着重对其校勘学、小学、史学等学术成就进行论述,展现其注重“实学”之特点。对于楼钥学术形成的因素,本文亦试图做出较深入的分析。除了当时文人政策、文化环境外,楼钥所处浙东之地域特点、学风教育、楼氏及汪氏家族的影响及“庆元党禁”的冲击,都是重要的因素,而楼钥与当时浙东著名学派及其代表人物之间的交往,对于其学术特色的形成以及当地学风的建设,更是起到了促进作用,楼钥的学术交往也比较典型地体现出浙东学风不守门户,兼容并蓄之特点。本文通过楼钥多方面的研究,欲更为全面、广泛地展现浙东学术之风貌。
英文摘要
    Though as a regional learning, Zhe Dong ( eastern area of Zhejiang province) learning plays an important role in the Chinese learning history. Studies of this subject are fruitful, but most of them just focus on some famous schools or representative figures. So there are so many scholars , especially who were not the members of any schools, are often ignored .And the figure of this thesis--Lou Yue , is such a typical example of them. There were few research that concerns of him or his academic accomplishment. Lou Yue was born in Siming,eastern area of Zhejiang province. He lived in a culture flourishing epoch in the South Song Dynasty, and had received a good family education from the childhood. He entered the government by passing the imperial examination, and afterwards became an outstanding minister for his political easies. He was well-known for his good political and moral conduct. Lou Yue had left an important collection named《GongKui Ji》,which preserved a lot of significant materials. Therefore ,this thesis will base on this collection and pay more attention to dissertate his textual criticism、philology and historiography and reveal his emphasis on “solid scholarship”. In addition, this thesis also tries to make deeper analyses of the factors which influence the development of Lou Yue’s learning. Besides the culture policy and human environment, the regional characteristic of Zhe Dong 、learning education、Lou’s and Wang’s  influence and the impact of “Qingyuan Dangjin”are all key factors. Furthermore,the learning exchange with other famous Zhe Dong schools and scholars also played an important role in the development of the characteristic of Lou Yue’s learning and the construction of the local learning style .From Lou Yue , we can see the characteristics of Zhe Dong learning clearly : open、comprehensive and extensive . Studying Lou Yue in many aspects, I hope this thesis will be of some help in revealing the style and features of Zhe Dong learning more comprehensively.

发表评论 共条 0评论
署名: 验证码:
  热门信息
中国省别全志(全50册)
历史文献学专业博士点专业主文…
中国历史文献学史
2014年历史文献学专业博士论文…
杭州出版社最新出版的煌煌巨著…
2014年历史学院历史文献学专业…
王余光、钱昆:《张舜徽先生学…
“地方史研究的新视野:中国古…
  最新信息
张涌泉谈写本文献学
吴玉贵谈《隋书》的编纂、点校…
义疏读者视角书籍史——评《宋…
江庆柏:《〈四库全书荟要〉研…
四库学研究新推进——《〈四库…
王瑞来先生新著《古籍校勘方法…
经学文献版本研究的典范之作—…
王锷教授著《〈礼记〉版本研究…
  专题研究
中国灾荒史论坛
清代社会史研究
清代政治史研究
清代经济史研究
中国历史地理研究
清代边疆民族研究
清代中外关系研究
近世思想文化史研究
近世秘密会社与民间教派研究
中国历史文献学研究
  研究中心
满文文献研究中心
清代皇家园林研究中心
中国人民大学生态史研究中心
友情链接
版权所有 Copyright@2003-2007 中国人民大学清史研究所 Powered by The Institute of Qing History
< 本版主持: 廖老师 > < 关于本站 | 联系站长 | 版权申明 >
您是本站第 位访客,京ICP备05020700号
账户:
密码: